| The Good: – Looks more interesting than Wrangler – More civil onroad than Wrangler – Faster offroad than base Wrangler |
The Bad: – More power would’ve been fun – Still kind of rough onroad – Expensive compared to indirect rivals |
| The Good: – Handsome styling – Cabin space and features – Comfort and offroad ability |
The Bad: – Average acceleration – Crossovers handle better – Premium price with options |
| The Good: – Classic good looks – Improved onroad civility – Unflappable offroad |
The Bad: – Hard to tell old from new – Not totally civil – Expensive high-spec versions |
| The Good: – Handsome styling – Cabin space and features – Power and handling |
The Bad: – Limited offroad cred – Fuel consumption – No third-row option |
| The Good: – Head-turning looks – Cabin trim and features – Comfortable on and offroad |
The Bad: – Head-turning looks – Bit pricey in its segment – Conservative onroad drive |
| The Good: – Classic good looks – Decent engine – Unbreakable offroad |
The Bad: – Maybe too classic – Unrefined onroad drive – Hard cabin plastics |
| The Good: – Very handsome styling – Decent cabin space and kit – Handling on and off the road |
The Bad: – Could be a wee bit quicker – Pretty darn heavy – Pricey with options |
| The Good: – Heritage styling – Practical cabin space – Useful telecom option |
The Bad: – Fairly noisy cabin – Needs a better engine – Over-active stability control |
| The Good: – Interesting exterior styling – Low-range gearing – Excellent telecom option |
The Bad: – Needs more rear legroom – Could do with a better engine – Soft on-road handling |
| The Good: – Handsome styling – Seriously fast – Decent handling |
The Bad: – Limited off-road ability – Some cheap cabin plastics – Rear legroom could be better |
