2024 Honda ZR-V
The Good: – Practical size and features – Seating space and cabin trim – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Below average boot space – Pricier than rivals – No sunroof option |
The Good: – Practical size and features – Seating space and cabin trim – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Below average boot space – Pricier than rivals – No sunroof option |
The Good: – Clean styling inside and out – Good cabin space – Efficiency and driving feel |
The Bad: – Tight third row – Pricier than rivals – Not particularly quick |
The Good: – Quick and fuel-efficient – Cabin trim and features – Good ride and handling |
The Bad: – Slightly less boot space – Throttle delay from idle – Limited offroad capabilities |
The Good: – Unique styling – Premium interior – Excellent handling |
The Bad: – Pricey in full-option trim – Bit less space than rivals – Less involving drive than before |
The Good: – Frisky turbo engine – Fair cabin space, features – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – Boot not as big as rivals – Odd cabin ergonomics – Expensive with turbo engine |
The Good: – Decent looks – Cabin space and practicality – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – No low-range gearing – Slightly pricier than rivals – Some hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Modern style inside and out – Cabin legroom and features – Fair ride and handling |
The Bad: – Lazy powertrain response – Offroad capability – Hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Good looks inside and out – Cabin trim and features – Comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Needs a better engine – Rubbery steering feel – Average boot space |
The Good: – Premium exterior styling – Cabin space and features – Comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Slightly soft handling – Limited offroad ability – Some quirky ergonomics |
The Good: – Competitive pricing – Cabin space and features – Comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Hard-plastic cabin bits – Slow acceleration – No all-wheel-drive option |