2013 Bentley Continental GT Speed
The Good: – Very, very fast – Timeless styling inside and out – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – Very, very expensive – Rear-seat space – Fuel economy |
The Good: – Very, very fast – Timeless styling inside and out – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – Very, very expensive – Rear-seat space – Fuel economy |
The Good: – Fancy exterior styling – Cabin space front and rear – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Not particularly quick – More commuter than racer – Some hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Great fuel economy – Cabin space and features – Decent ride quality |
The Bad: – Bit pricey with options – Noisy on acceleration – Some hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Strong powertrain – Cabin space and features – Tight handling and brakes |
The Bad: – More expensive than you think – Lacking steering feel – Barely useful boot space |
The Good: – Great fuel economy – Cabin space and features – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – Could be quicker – Fiddly multimedia system – No all-wheel-drive option |
The Good: – Contemporary styling – Cabin space and features – Great ride and handling |
The Bad: – Average fuel economy – Limited offroad ability – Some hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Least expensive Range Rover – Cabin space and features – Smooth-enough ride |
The Bad: – Most expensive crossover – Rear access and boot space – Some hard cabin plastics |
The Good: – Superb engine performance – Cabin space and features – Great handling |
The Bad: – Pricey with options – Some hard cabin plastics – Throttle response at idle |
The Good: – Class-competitive engine – Class-leading handling – Class-beating cabin materials |
The Bad: – A bit on the noisy side – Somewhat shallow boot – Staid cabin design |
The Good: – Great exterior styling – Value-packed features – Fairly comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Soft handling – Most safety features optional – No low-range gearing |