2024 Toyota Land Cruiser 70 LC76 Hard Top
The Good: – Old-school reliability – Old-school style – Old-school experience |
The Bad: – Limited rear legroom – Ride and handling – Acceleration and economy |
The Good: – Old-school reliability – Old-school style – Old-school experience |
The Bad: – Limited rear legroom – Ride and handling – Acceleration and economy |
The Good: – Modern tech features – Cabin trim and space – Strong turbo engine |
The Bad: – Competes with buses in size – Some hard-plastic trim – Expensive with options |
The Good: – Better styling inside and out – Cabin space and features – Very comfortable ride |
The Bad: – Bit pricey with options – Few hard-plastic cabin bits – No performance improvement |
The Good: – As fast as a sports car – Cabin trim and features – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – A little bit expensive – Not as spacious as expected – Some overdone electronic features |
The Good: – As fast as a sports car – Cabin trim and features – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – A little bit expensive – Not as spacious as expected – Limited offroad ability |
The Good: – Good fuel economy – Great cabin space and features – Spritely handling |
The Bad: – Higher-than-average pricing – Slower than old model – Rear drum brakes |
The Good: – Excellent styling in and out – Powerful and responsive – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – Limited offroad capabilities – Artificial steering feel – No variable ride-height option |
The Good: – Very, very spacious – Comfort and cabin tech – Handles well enough |
The Bad: – Very, very big – Adequate but not quick – Few low-rent interior bits |
The Good: – Coupe-like styling – Cabin space and features – Power, ride and handling |
The Bad: – Bit pricey with options – Few hard-plastic cabin bits – Some rivals are quieter |
The Good: – Excellent styling in and out – Powerful and responsive – Ride and handling |
The Bad: – Average rear legroom – Few ergonomics issues – Some over-styled plastic trim |